THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S MEENA AGENCY LTD., JAMNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's submission regarding the CBDT circular. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to the low tax effect.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order directing the AO to pass a rectification order. The assessee argued that the Revenue's appeal was hit by a CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable in light of the CBDT circular on monetary limits for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
The instant appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 13.04.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamnagar arising out of the order dated 24.03.2015 passed by the ACIT, Circle – 3, Jamnagar under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to “the Act”) for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13.
The grounds of appeal
raised by the Revenue read are as under:- “1. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in allowing appeal of the assessee and directing the AO to pass rectification order u/s. 154.
2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not appreciating the fact that department has assessed what the assessee itself has disclosed and as such, there was no mistake apparent from records falling within the purview of section 154 of the Act and that the assessee cannot be DCIT vs. M/s. Meena Agency Ltd. AY 2012-13 - 2 - allowed to make fresh claims under the guise of ‘rectification of apparent mistake.’ 3. On the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) ought to have upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. 4. That the revenue craves leaves to add, amend, alter or withdraw any ground of appeal
5. It is therefore prayed that the order of the CIT(A), Jamnagar may kindly be set aside and that of Assessing Officer be restored.”
3. At the time of hearing of the appeal, it was submitted by the Ld.AR for the assessee that appeal filed by the Revenue is hit by recently issued CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08/08/2019 revising the previous thresholds pertaining to tax effects. As per aforesaid Circular, all pending appeals filed by Revenue are liable to be dismissed as a measure for reducing litigation where the tax effect does not exceed the prescribed monetary limit which is now revised at Rs.50 Lakhs. In the instant case, the tax effect on the disputed issues raised by the Revenue is stated to be not exceeding Rs.50 lakhs and therefore appeal of the Revenue is required to be dismissed in limine.
The Learned DR for the Revenue fairly admitted the applicability of the CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019. Accordingly, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as not maintainable. However, it will be open to the Revenue to seek restoration of its appeal on showing inapplicability of the aforesaid CBDT Circular in any manner.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Court on 28th February, 2020 at Rajkot.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026