THE DHANBAD CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, PATNA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 39/RAN/2018Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 July 20202 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's explanation that it lacked computer facilities in all its rural branches. Following a coordinate bench's decision, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative bank, failed to report banking transactions within the prescribed time. The DIT imposed penalties under Section 271FA for this delay.

What were the issues?

Whether a cooperative bank with rural branches lacking computer facilities can be penalized for delayed reporting of banking transactions under Section 271FA.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271FA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI ‘E-COURT’AT KOLKATA

Before: Shri S.S, Godara, JM & Dr. A.L. Saini, AM

आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench(Oral): These assessee’s six appeals for assessment years 2011-12 to 2016-17 arise against the Director of Income-tax (Intelligence & Criminal Investigation), Patna’s orders all dated 20.11.2017, involving proceedings u/s 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’); respectively. Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. The assessee’s identical sole substantive grievance raised in all these six cases seeks to reverse the DIT’s action imposing section 271FA penalty of Rs.22,000/- each in former four and 1,10,000/- each in the latter two assessment years; respectively, for the sole reason that it had failed to report the corresponding banking transactions within the prescribed time period. The assessee’s sole plea is that it is a cooperative bank having rural branches throughout the district of Dhanbad wherein it does not to 44/Ran/2018 Assessment Years:2011-12 to 2016-17 The Dhanbad Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Page 2 have computer facilities for all transactions. We find merit in assessee’s explanation since it is a cooperative bank not equipped with modern tally purchases. Be that as it may, we make it clear that the assessee is already regulated by all the rules and regulations applicable for a cooperative bank and it did not stand to gain by delaying any information to the authorities. This tribunal’s coordinate bench’s decision in Durgapur Steel Peoples’ Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. Director of Income Tax [2016] 74 taxmann.com 97 (Kolkata-Trib.) also holds the same view only. We follow the same mutatis mutandis and direct the DIT to delete the impugned penalty.

3.

These assessee’s six appeals are allowed.

Order pronounced in open court on 14/07/2020.

More judgments on Section 271FA

All 190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271FA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →