M/S SUNNY CONSTRUCTION & CO.,KODERMA vs. ACIT,CIRCLE 1(1), HAZARIBAGH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated beyond the four-year period from the end of the relevant assessment year without recording any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material particulars. Therefore, the reassessment was quashed.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2010-11, based on the assessee's P/L account. The assessee's appeal arose from the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated beyond four years are valid without demonstrating failure of the assessee to disclose material facts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH “E” Court at KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
O R D E R PER BENCH (Oral):- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2010-11 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Hazaribagh’s order dated 09.05.2018 passed in case No.10028/HZB/2017-18, involving proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires at the outset that the Assessing Officer had initiated section 148 r.w.s. 147 proceedings against the assessee as per the notice dated 24.03.2017 after recording the following reasons:- “It has been observed that the assessee has debited Rs.14,72,991/- in the P/L account under the sub-head ‘Revenue’. It is quite evident from the record that the expenditure made under this sub-head is not revenue expenditure and hence books of account are required to be examined. It is a sort of recovery against revenue (i.e.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Suryansh Chawda vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Yash Shilawat vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Pushpa Devi Verma vs. State Bank Of INDIA Through Its Chief ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Ayan Khan vs. Bandhan BankMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026