V. NAGESWARA RAO,ELURU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, ELURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had received relief in the consequential order and no longer had a grievance. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, the assessee submitted a letter stating they had received relief in a consequential order and wished to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to subsequent relief obtained in a consequential order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE
Date of hearing : 07/12/2020. Date of pronouncement : 07/12/2020. O R D E R
PER JUSTICE P.P. BHATT, PRESIDENT
The assessee has filed this appeal against the order passed u/sec. 263 of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Rajahmundry, dated 31/03/2019 for the A.Y. 2015-16.
When this appeal is taken up for hearing, ld.AR submitted a letter stating that in the consequential order passed u/sec. 143(3) r.w.s. 263, the assessee got relief and has no grievance, hence, assessee wants to withdraw the appeal.
(V. Nageswara Rao) 3. Ld.DR has expressed no objection for withdrawal of appeal. 4. In view of the letter filed by the assessee dated 03/12/2020, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order Pronounced in open Court through video conference on this 07th day of Dec., 2020
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026