PAWAN KUMAR GOEL,LUDHIANA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C-7, LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. This was based on the assessee's participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and the issuance of a certificate by the Income Tax Department.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal. This was because the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' and received a certificate under it.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee if they have opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and received a certificate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DIVISION BENCH’B’, CHANDIGARH
Before: MS. DIVA SINGH & MS. ANNAPURNA GUPTA
ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, J.M.
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana dt. 14/08/2018.
During the course of hearing the Assessee furnished an application praying for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
Sub: Request for permission to withdraw appeal in the case of Sh. Pawan Kumar Goel, 259, Industrial Area-A, Ludhiana.... A/Y 2012-13 ...PAN: ABGPG2298F ......................
Sir, Respectfully it is submitted that Sh. Pawan Kumar Goel is pending for adjudication before the Hon'ble Bench. The petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the above captioned appeal as the appellant company has moved before Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- 1, Ludhiana under "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme". Also, Form 3 has been issued by Ld. PCIT-1, Ludhiana on 09.12.2020, copy of the same is enclosed.
Thanking You Yours faithfully Sd/- (Ashwani Kumar) C.A. Counsel for the Appellant 3. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 798198230091220, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on 16/12/2020 )
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026