SHRI HARINDER SINGH,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-6(5), LUDHIANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and the department had issued the necessary form. The Revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2011-12. During the hearing, the assessee's representative sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CHANDIGARH BENCH
Before: SMT. DIVA SINGH, JM
आदेश/ORDER
By the present appeal, the assessee assails the correctness of the order dated 13.09.2019 of CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana pertaining to 2011-12 assessment year on various grounds.
However at the time of hearing, ld. AR relying upon the application dated 11.12.2020 prays for a withdrawal of the appeal filed on the grounds that the assessee has moved an application under “The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,2020”. The department, it was submitted, has consequently issued Form No. 3 thereafter to the assessee, copy of which is filed.
The ld. Sr.DR Shri Ashok Khanna on a perusal of record had no objection to the prayer of the assessee.
ITA 1409 /CHD/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 Page 2 of 2
I have heard the submissions and perused the material on record. In the aforementioned peculiar facts and circumstances considering the record and the submissions, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Said order was pronounced at the time of virtual hearing itself in the presence of the parties via Webex.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 23rd December, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026