M/S. ANAND FOOD & DAIRY PRODUCTS,ANAND vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANAND CIRCLE, ANAND
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the deduction under section 80IB(11A) is not admissible for AY 2014-15 as it falls beyond the 10-year period from the initial year. The appeal was also noted to be time-barred.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deduction under section 80IB(11A) for AY 2014-15. The revenue authorities and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction, considering the period of 10 consecutive years for the deduction had already expired.
What were the issues?
The key issue was the determination of the initial year for claiming deduction under section 80IB(11A) and whether the claim for AY 2014-15 was within the admissible period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘C’
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 10/01/2020 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 13/01/2020 O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Vadodara dated 25.1.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2014-15.
Sole grievance of the assessee is that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80IB(11A) of the Act. The ld.counsel for the assessee at the very submitted that the issue in dispute is covered against the assessee by order of the ITAT passed in for the Asstt.Year 2012-13.
The short controversy involved in this case is regarding determination of initial year from which it could be construed that the assessee entitled for deduction under section 80IA. As per the assessee, the initial year for grant of deduction was assessment year 2005-06, whereas the Revenue authorities took initial year as assessment year 2002-03. The deduction admittedly was admissible for 10 consecutive years from the initial year. In the Asstt.Year 2012-13 Tribunal has held such deduction as admissible upto Asstt.Year 2011-12. Present year is assessment year 2014-15, which is beyond period of 10 years. Therefore, in this year also deduction is not admissible to the assessee. The ld.Revenue authorities have rightly disentitled the assessee for claiming deduction under section 80IB. It is also pertinent to observe that appeal of the assessee is time barred by six days, and no application for condonation of delay. We do not find any merit in this appeal. It is dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the Open Court on 13th January, 2020
More judgments on Section 80IB(11A)
- Nokha Agro Services Private Limited, Bikaner vs ACIT Circle-1, BikanerITA 927/JODH/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Imagine Enterprises, Lucknow vs DCIT-3 Lucknow New, Pratyakshkar BhawanITA 326/LKW/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Anand Foods, Dehradun vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), KashipurITA 141/DDN/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle-8(1), HyderabadITTPA 1301/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
- Dodla Dairy Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT Circle -8(1), HyderabadITA 466/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026