M/S. ANAND FOOD & DAIRY PRODUCTS,ANAND vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANAND CIRCLE, ANAND

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1310/AHD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad13 January 2020AY 2014-152 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the deduction under section 80IB(11A) is not admissible for AY 2014-15 as it falls beyond the 10-year period from the initial year. The appeal was also noted to be time-barred.

What were the facts?

The assessee claimed deduction under section 80IB(11A) for AY 2014-15. The revenue authorities and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction, considering the period of 10 consecutive years for the deduction had already expired.

What were the issues?

The key issue was the determination of the initial year for claiming deduction under section 80IB(11A) and whether the claim for AY 2014-15 was within the admissible period.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80IB(11A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD – BENCH ‘C’

Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI WASEEM AHMED

For Appellant: Shri Piyush Agarwal, AR
For Respondent: Shri L.P. Jain, Sr.DR
Hearing: 10/01/2020Pronounced: 13/01/2020

सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 10/01/2020 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 13/01/2020 O R D E R PER RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Vadodara dated 25.1.2018 passed for the Asstt.Year 2014-15.

2.

Sole grievance of the assessee is that the ld.CIT(A) has erred in confirming disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80IB(11A) of the Act. The ld.counsel for the assessee at the very submitted that the issue in dispute is covered against the assessee by order of the ITAT passed in for the Asstt.Year 2012-13.

3.

The short controversy involved in this case is regarding determination of initial year from which it could be construed that the assessee entitled for deduction under section 80IA. As per the assessee, the initial year for grant of deduction was assessment year 2005-06, whereas the Revenue authorities took initial year as assessment year 2002-03. The deduction admittedly was admissible for 10 consecutive years from the initial year. In the Asstt.Year 2012-13 Tribunal has held such deduction as admissible upto Asstt.Year 2011-12. Present year is assessment year 2014-15, which is beyond period of 10 years. Therefore, in this year also deduction is not admissible to the assessee. The ld.Revenue authorities have rightly disentitled the assessee for claiming deduction under section 80IB. It is also pertinent to observe that appeal of the assessee is time barred by six days, and no application for condonation of delay. We do not find any merit in this appeal. It is dismissed.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced in the Open Court on 13th January, 2020

More judgments on Section 80IB(11A)

All 71 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80IB(11A) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →