ASHOK KUMAR AGARWAL,DIBRUGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that no one appeared for the assessee despite a letter being filed. In the absence of the assessee's representation, the appeal could not be adjudicated on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2012-13 was against an order passed by the CIT(A), which arose from an assessment order under Section 147/143(3). No one appeared on behalf of the assessee during the hearing.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the non-appearance of the assessee before the Tribunal for the adjudication of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GAUHATI ‘E’COURT, AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini:
The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2012-13, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-Dibrugarh, in appeal no. CIT(A), Dibrugarh/10028/2017-18, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 / 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘Act’) dated 06/11/2017.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee but a letter was filed by the assessee before the Registrar of ITAT dated 19.05.2020 stating that the assessee had opted
2 Ashok Kumar Agarwal Assessment Year:2012-13 for Vivaad Se Vishwaas scheme therefore he wanted to withdraw the appeal. The application of the assessee to withdraw the appeal is reproduced below: “With reference to above I want to submit that I have opted for Vivaad se Vishwaas Scheme in case of the assessment order appealed against for A.Y. 2012-13. Therefore, I want to withdraw my appeal for the A.Y. 2012-13. Kindly do the needful at your end.”
We have heard ld. DR for the revenue and since the ld. D.R. did not raise any objection therefore we dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Court on 17.06.2020
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026