DINESH KUMAR SONTHALIA (HUF),JAMSHEDPUR vs. ITO,WARD-1(2), JAMSHEDPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee informed the tribunal that they have filed an application under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. The tribunal accepted the assessee's plea for withdrawal of the appeal in light of this.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for assessment year 2011-12 was filed against an order passed under section 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee sought to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI, “E” COURT, AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM & SHRI S.S. GODARA, JM
आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri S. S. GODARA, JM:
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12 arises against the CIT(A)-Jamshedpur’s order dated 14/01/2019, passed in case no. 20/JSR/2018- 19 involving proceedings u/s 147 / 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short the ‘Act’). Case files perused.
Learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is availing the amicable settlement benefit as per the “Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020” and has filed an application in this regard. He wanted an adjournment or in the alternative
Dinesh Kumar Sonthalia(HUF) A.Y.: 2011-12 pleaded for protection that if its application under the scheme is rejected by the authorities, this appeal may be restored. Revenue is fair enough in not disputing assessee’s foregoing plea.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
Order pronounced in the Court on 23.09.2020
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026