LATE SHRI SAJID R. DHAMANI(THROUGH L/H SMT. SUCHITRA S. DHAMANI),INDORE vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), VADODARA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2490/AHD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad25 February 2020AY 2008-093 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the quantum additions forming the basis of the penalty were deleted, the penalty levied had become infructuous. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer levied a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) based on quantum additions made under Section 153A. The assessee's counsel pointed out that the quantum additions, which formed the basis for the penalty, had been deleted by a co-ordinate bench of the ITAT.

What were the issues?

Whether a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying quantum additions have been deleted by a higher appellate authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c),Section 153A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH

Before: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri D.K. Parikh, A.R
For Respondent: Shri Vidhyut Trivedi, Sr. D.R, Shri D.K. Parikh, A.R

आदेश/ORDER PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- The solitary ground of appeal is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)-1 dated 14-08-2018 arising out of sustaining penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) vide order u/s. 153A r.w.s. 143(3) dated 31st March, 2013.

Page No 2 Late Sri Sajid R. Dhanani vs. ACIT

2.

During the course of appellate proceedings, at the outset, the ld. counsel has brought to our notice that the quantum addition on the basis of which the impugned penalty was levied has been deleted by the Co-ordinate Bench of the ITAT in the case of Late Sri Sajid R. Dhanani vide 158, 159/Ahd/2015 order dated 30-07-2019. On the other hand, the ld. departmental representative could not controvert these facts reported by the ld. counsel that impugned quantum appeal was deleted by the Co-ordinate Bench vide above cited order.

3.

We have heard both the sides and perused the material on record. It is noticed that assessing officer vide order dated 16th Mach, 2016 has levied penalty to the amount of Rs. 6,55,000/- on the basis of quantum additions made by the assessing officer u/s. 153A r.w.s. 143(3) of the act on 31st March, 2013. Since the quantum addition on the basis of which penalty was levied has been deleted by the Co-ordinate bench as cited above, therefore, we consider that penalty levied in the case of the assessee has become infructuous, therefore, this appeal of the assessee is allowed.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →