SWARNA EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS-4, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the 22-day delay, finding it neither wilful nor intentional. The appeal was remanded to the CIT(A) with a direction to decide it on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) against denial of exemptions under Section 11, but it was delayed by 22 days. The CIT(A) refused to condone the delay and disposed of the appeal on merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘SMC-B’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi
Date of Hearing : 07/12/2020 Date of Pronouncement : 09/12/2020 O R D E R This is assessee’s appeal against the order of CIT(A)-9, Hyderabad dated 27.03.2019 relating to A.Y. 2015-16. This appeal was taken up for hearing through Video Conference on 07.12.2020 and both the parties were heard.
It is noticed that the assessee has filed appeal before the CIT(A) against the assessment order denying the claim of exemptions claimed u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), and the appeal was filed with a delay of 22 days. The CIT(A) has refused to condone the delay and disposed the appeal on merits. 2.1. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the delay of 22 days may kindly be condoned and the CIT(A) may be directed to dispose of the appeal on merits in accordance with law. 2.2. The Ld.D.R. opposed the condonation of delay and remand to CIT(A). ./2019 Swarna Educational Academy A.Y. 2015-16 3. Having regard to rival contentions ad material placed on record, I find that the delay is of 22 days and as per the reasons given in the Petition for condonation of delay, I am convinced that the delay is neither wilful nor intentional. Therefore, I condone the delay and the appeal is remanded to the file of CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal on merits.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mohd. Aqil Proprietor Of M/S Ma Garments vs. Principal Commissioner Central GST, Delhi And Anr.Delhi · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Crs Builders Private Limited vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Noore Manpower Services vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- Maa Bhawani Minrals vs. Commissioner Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026