RUMA BANIK,AGARTALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - UDAIPUR, AGARTALA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The withdrawal is subject to the condition that if the scheme proposal is not accepted, the assessee can apply for recalling the order.
What were the facts?
The assessee had filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The assessee subsequently opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be kept pending when the assessee has opted for a dispute resolution scheme like Vivad Se Vishwas.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI BENCH,
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
These appeals are preferred by the assessee against the separate order of Ld. CIT(A)- 1, Shillong dated 20.09.2017 and 29.03.2019 for assessment years 2014-15 & 2015-16 respectively.
At the outset, it is noted that Shri A.K. Agarwala, FCA has filed a letter dated 15.12.2020 wherein he has brought to my notice that the assessee has opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 (hereinafter, the ‘scheme’) and accordingly has filed Form 1 and 2 before the competent authority as per the scheme in respect of these appeals and is awaiting From 3 from the competent authority. Taking into consideration the fact that since the assessee has opted for the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 202
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026