. SHREE GOVIND DEVJI BIOGENIC (P) LTD.,AGRA vs. I.T.O.-4(4), AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) order was passed without affording a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to be heard and present documents. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was decided ex-parte by the CIT(A) as notices were returned unserved. The assessee contended that they did not receive proper notice and an opportunity to be heard. The Tribunal noted issues with service of notices to the assessee at the given address.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order was validly passed ex-parte without ensuring due service of notice and an opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Whether the initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 was legally valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH: AGRA
Before: SHRI LALIET KUMARAND DR. MITHA LAL MEENA
Per LALIET KUMAR, J.M.:
This appeal of assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner
of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Agra, dated 31-03-2016 for the AY.2006-07 on the following Grounds:
“1. BECAUSE, upon due consideration of the facts and in the overall circumstances of the case the Ld.CIT(A) has fallen in error in passing ex-parte order without due consideration of the legal position and evidences available on assessment records. 2
BECAUSE, the appellant denies his liability to be assessed in terms of notice dated 30.03.2013 issued to him under section 148 of the Act.
BECAUSE, authorities below failed to appreciate that there is no valid initiatio
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026