SMT. SANDHYA KANTILAL KOLI,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, VAPI WARD-3, VAPI

PDF
ITA 313/AHD/2016Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 October 2020AY 2005-062 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT

Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble

Hearing: 15.10.2020

आयकरअपील�यअ�धकरण,सुरत�यायपीठ,सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Hon'ble JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Hon'ble ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Virtual Court) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No’s.313/AHD/2016 & 3383/AHD/2016 �नधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2005-06 Smt. Sandhya Kanatilal Koli, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Vapi Ward-8, Vapi. LIG – 1 – 41/410, GIDS, Vapi – 396 195. [PAN: AEIPK 3625 D] अपीलाथ� / Appellant ��यथ�/Respondent �नधा�रतीक�ओरसे /Assessee by Shri A.Gopalakrishnan – CA राज�वक�ओरसे /Revenue by Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of hearing: 15.10.2020 उ�घोषणाक�तार�ख/Pronouncement on: 15.10.2020 आदेश /O R D E R PER BENCH: At the outset itself, Shri A.GopalaKrishnan, CA, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that Assessee Company has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. A copy of Form No. 1 and Form No. 3 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 13.08.2020 were also placed before the Bench. Shri A. Gopalakrishnan, on behalf of the Assessee Company, by way of a letter dated 26.09.2020, submitted that assessee company prayed for withdrawal of the appeal to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise any objection.

2.

We have heard both the parties and gone through Form 1 & 3 filed by the assessee to avail the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee company has prayed for withdrawal of both the appeals. The Ld. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if the said appeals are withdrawn by the assessee company. Consequently, both these appeals, are dismissed as withdrawn.

Smt. Sandhya Kantilal Koli Vs. ITO, Vapi Ward-8, Vapi. ITA No’s.313/AHD/2016 & 3383/AHD/2016 for A.Y.2005-06

3.

In the result, the two appeals of the assessee (in ITA No.313/AHD/2016 & ITA No.3383/AHD/2016 for A.Y. 2005-06) are dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

Order pronounced in the open court on 15-10-2020 while hearing the appeal.

Sd/- Sd/- (Dr ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) (लेखा सद�यतथा/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (�याियक सद�यकेसम� /JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, �दनांक Dated: 15th Oct, 2020 S.Gangadhara Rao, Sr.PS Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / / TRUE COPY / / Assistant Registrar, Surat