DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(1)(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI vs. AT KEARNEY LTD.- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE, GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since a bilateral APA was executed and covered the assessment year in question, all pending appeals on the subject matter should be withdrawn. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal was liable to be dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made by the TPO concerning intra-group services and interest on receivables. The assessee argued that both issues were covered by a bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) between India and the USA.
What were the issues?
Whether the payment for intra-group services was for commercial expediency and whether interest on receivables constituted an international transaction, both of which were subject to a bilateral APA.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92B(1),Section 92CA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I’, NEW DELHI
Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Yogesh Kumar
Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member:
The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-42, New Delhi dated 22.01.2019.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Hon’ble CIT(A) was justified in law to delete the addition made by the TPO and hold that the payment made for Intra group services was for commercial expediency?
2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case Hon'ble CIT(A) was right in holding that the TPO has re- characterized the intra group services transaction?
3. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Hon’ble C1T(A) was right in not appreciating that TPO has not disallowed the intra group services merely on the issue of non-substantiation of commercial expediency by the assessee but on several factors? 4. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Hon'ble CIT(A) was justified in law to delete the adjustment towards the interest on receivables without considering the fact that deferred payment or receivable or any other debt arising during the course of business money is held to be an "International Transaction" within the meaning of section 92B(1) of the Act?”
The appeal relates to the following Transfer Pricing ('TP') issues:-
1.
1. Interest on outstanding receivables ('Receivables') 2. Receipt of support services ('Intra-group services' or 'IGS') 4. The Ld. CIT(A) vide the order adjudicated on the additions on account of Receivables and IGS. Out of these two issues, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition on account of Receivables. With regard IGS. the Ld. CIT(A) partly allowed the international transaction, thereby reducing the adjustment under Section 92CA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to 11,22,46,547/- as against INR 18,27,21,720/-.
5. The Assessee and the revenue are in appeal before Tribunal.
6. The ld AR submitted that both issues are subject matter of a Bilateral Advance Pricing Agreement ('APA') between India and USA with Profit Split method ('PSM') being selected as the most appropriate method where AY 2014-15 is the first year of APA roll back. The bilateral APA dated 24 March 2022 has been signed and executed by all the parties.
7. Further, in relation to IGS, all the services forming part of the pool of IGS are covered as per Form No. 3CEF filed after the execution of the bilateral APA. It is submitted that with regard to receivables , the interest on the outstanding receivables has been considered while filing the Form 3CEF per the bilateral APA.
8. As per Rule 10RA(5) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 when an APA has been signed and executed, all the appeals pertaining to the decided years should be withdrawn as no further adjudication is required. The said rule is reproduced below for ready reference -
"Rule 10RA. Procedure for giving effect to rollback provision of an Agreement ...(5) If any appeal filed by the Assessing Officer or the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner is pending before the Appellate Tribunal or the High Court for a rollback year, on the issue which is subject matter of the rollback provision for that year, the said appeal to the extent of the subject covered under the agreement shall be withdrawn by the Assessing Officer or the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner, as the case may be, within three months of filing of modified return by the applicant."
The Assessee's appeal (ITA no. 2956/Del/2019) pertaining to AY 2014-15 has already been adjudicated by the coordinate bench of ITAT wherein the appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn based on the fact that the transactions are covered by the Bilateral APA.
In view of these facts the appeal of the revenue is also liable to dismissed.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 18/11/2022.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026