ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S AMTEK AUTO LTD., GURGAON
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that upon the approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, all claims not part of the plan, including those of the revenue, stand extinguished. Therefore, no proceedings can be continued for such claims.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed appeals against the assessee's partly allowed appeals for AY 2012-13 and 2013-14. The assessee company had undergone insolvency resolution, and its resolution plan was approved by the NCLT.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings can be continued against an assessee whose resolution plan has been approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, extinguishing all claims not part of the plan.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. SHAMIM YAHYA & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
The revenue has filed the appeals challenging the order dated 15.11.2016 for A.Y. 2012-13 & 2013-14 whereby the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed.
At the time of hearing, on behalf of the respondent-assessee it was submitted that the company has changed the name to Revent Precision Engineering Limited and a new PAN number has been allowed. Further the assessee had gone through insolvency resolution process before The Hon’ble , 576./Del/2017 M/s. Amtek Auto Ltd. 2 National Company Law Tribunal (‘NCLT’), Chandigarh Bench and the resolution plan have been approved with effect from 08.12.2021. The Revenue did not controvert the aforesaid facts.
In the light of the aforesaid, the Bench is of considered opinion that the provisions of section 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as amended by the amendment Act, 2019 comes into operation and once resolution plan is duly approved, all the claims including those of the revenuee which are not part of the resolution plan stand extinguish and no proceedings in respect of those claim which are not part of resolution plan can be continued. Reliance in this regard can also be placed on the judgment dated 13.04.2021 of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Private Limited v. Edeweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & Ors., civil no. 8129 of 2019 (2021) 126 taxman.com.
In the light of aforesaid, the appeals of revenue are dismissed being rendered infructuous. Order pronounced in the open court on 21st December, 2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026