RAJMAN,AMBEDKAR NAGAR vs. ITO WARD 3 AMBEDKAR NAGAR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR

ITA 79/ALLD/2024Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 October 2024AY 2018-196 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee was handicapped in representing his case due to the demise of his counsel. Several legal issues were raised which could have been decided on merits. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee purchased agricultural land for a consideration less than the stamp value, leading to an addition under section 56(2)(x). The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal in limine for non-prosecution after the assessee's counsel passed away.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine without deciding the legal issues on merits, and whether the matter should be restored to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 56(2)(x),Section 143(3),Section 144,Section 142(1),Section 2(14),Section 50C(2),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD

Hearing: 04.09.2024Pronounced: 25.10.2024

PER SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This is an appeal against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 12.04.2024, dismissing the appeal of the assessee in limine. The grounds of appeal preferred are as under:-

“1. That, on facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by Ld CIT(A) is bad both in the eyes of law and on the facts of the case.

1.1.

That, on facts and circumstances of the case. Ld CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without going either into the merits of the case or discussing the various grounds of appeal filed by the appellant.

2.

That, on facts and circumstances of the case, without prejudice to oth

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 56(2)(x)

All 565 judgments and leading authorities on Section 56(2)(x) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →