Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B” : PUNE
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 23/1050057078(1), dated 23.02.2023, involving penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Case called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
2 ITA.No.489/PUN./2023 2. Coming to the assessee’s sole substantive grievance that both the lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in imposing the section 271(1)(c) penalty of Rs.90,160/-, it emerges at the outset that the Assessing Officer’s corresponding penalty show cause notice dated 02.02.2017 issued to the taxpayer had nowhere specified or struck-off the relevant limb as to whether he had concealed particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such an income, as the case may be. We make it clear that the “NFAC” itself has fairly reproduced the Assessing Officer’s penalty show cause notice in it’s order under challenge at page-8.
Faced with the situation, we quote hon’ble jurisdictional high court’s recent landmark decision in Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh Vs. ACIT [2021] 434 ITR 1 (Bom.) (FB) has settled the law that the above stated failure on the Assessing Officer’s part indeed vitiates the entire penal proceedings itself. We thus delete the impugned penalty for this precise reason alone. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 25.05.2023.