SOLAPUR CETP AKKALKOT ROAD MIDC ASSOCIATION,SOLAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXCEPTION), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(E) for a fresh adjudication. The CIT(E) was directed to consider the assessee's object clauses and activities and provide effective opportunities for hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Solapur CETP Akkalkot Road MIDC Association, applied for registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) rejected the application without adequately considering the assessee's object clauses and activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly considered the assessee's objects and activities while rejecting the registration application. Whether the assessee was afforded adequate opportunities for hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B” : PUNE
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
Learned CIT-DR could hardly dispute the clinching fact during the course of hearing that the CIT(E)’s impugned order nowhere deals with the assessee’s object clauses and activities alleged to have been carried-out as per its explanation during the lower proceedings. The fact also remains that the assessee had not placed all the relevant requirements in the impugned proceedings by placing on record the relevant evidence(s). Faced with this situation, we
3 ITA.No.461/PUN./2023 deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s sole substantive grievance back to the CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate adjudication as per law preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 25.05.2023.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026