PARISAR ABHIYANTRIKI NOKRANCHI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT, NASHIK,NASHIK vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC BANGALURU, BANGALURU
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for assessment years prior to the amendment by the Finance Act, 2021, the denial of deduction under Section 80P for a belatedly filed return processed under Section 143(1) was not justified. Following precedent, the Tribunal directed the CPC to allow the deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a credit cooperative society, filed its return of income claiming deduction under Section 80P. The return was processed under Section 143(1) by CPC, Bengaluru, which denied the deduction because the return was filed belatedly, after the due date specified under Section 139(1). The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) confirmed this denial.
What were the issues?
Whether a credit cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P when its return of income is filed belatedly, and the processing is done under Section 143(1) for an assessment year prior to the amendment of Section 143(1)(a)(v).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 09.02.2023 for the assessment year 2019-20.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a credit cooperative society duly incorporated under the Maharashtra Co- operative Societies Act, 1960. The Return of Income for the assessment year 2019-20 was filed on 30.11.2020 showing Rs.Nil income after claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). The said return of income was processed by the CPC, Bengaluru u/s 143(1) vide intimation dated 29.01.2021, wherein, the exemption u/s 80P was denied on the ground that the return of income was not filed within due date prescribed u/s 139(1) of the Act.
Being aggrieved by the above intimation, an appeal was filed before the NFAC, who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the CPC, Bengaluru. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal. 5. I heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Admittedly, in the present appeal, the return of income was filed belatedly. The issue in the present appeal is no longer res integra as settled by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shaista Praween vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of GST And Central Excise, RourkelaOrissa · 6 Nov 2026
- Paonta Hp Centre vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Multitech Agro INDIA (Opc) PVT LTD vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 5 Nov 2026
- Gopa Satya Madhava Subbarao vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 5 Nov 2026
- M/S Kallu Cable vs. The Commissioner State Goods And Service TaxUttarakhand · 5 Nov 2026