ELITE KRUSHI VIKAS SANSTHA NAGARDALE,KOLHAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

Ground No. 2 raised by the assessee questioning the action of CIT(Exemption) for not following the principles of natural justice in the facts and circumstances of the case.

The ld. AR submits that there was no opportunity for the assessee to put forth its claims by way of supporting evidence before the CIT(Exemption) and prayed to remand the matter to the file of CIT(Exemption) for its fresh investigation.

The ld. DR fairly conceded that the assessee may be given one more opportunity for prosecuting its case before the CIT(Exemption).

On perusal of the impugned order, we note that the assessee filed application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s. 12AA of the Act. In pursuance of such application, the CIT(Exemption) issued notice on ITBA portal requesting the assessee to upload certain information/clarification i.e. date of commencement of activity, date of expiry of provisional registration, details of any other Law applicable for achievement of objectives and the proof of compliance of said Law, proof of identity of main trustees/directors, year-wise list of donations received, list of donors, note on activities along with supporting credible evidence, details of business undertakings etc. by 24-01-2023. According to the CIT(Exemption), the assessee has not furnished note on activities and evidence in support of the activities claimed to have been carried out, in view of same issued another notice to show cause as to why the application should not be cancelled. It is observed that the assessee has not furnished note on activities and credible evidence in support of activities claimed to have been carried which is clear from para 3 of the impugned order. The CIT(Exemption) in the absence of such tangible material in respect of details of proof and activity being carried out rejected the application in Form No. 10AB and cancelled the registration granted on 27-10-2021. The ld. AR submits that the assessee is ready to produce all the evidences as

In view of our decision in ground No. 2, consequently, the ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.