SHRI VITTHAL SSK LTD.,SOLAPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, SOLAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s approach of granting relief on one issue and confirming others without proper discussion was illegal and unreasonable. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society running a sugarcane factory, filed its return showing Nil income after set off of losses. The Assessing Officer made significant additions, including for excessive cane purchase price and sale of sugar at concessional rates.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) correctly adjudicated the appeal by granting relief on one ground and confirming others without proper analysis. The legality of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 14.03.2023 for the assessment year 2009-10.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a Co- operative Society engaged in the business of running of sugarcane factory. The Return of Income for the assessment year 2009-10 was filed on 29.09.2009 and the same was revised on 08.06.2010 at Rs.Nil income after claiming set off of the brought forward losses. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Solapur (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 16.12.2011 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) at a total income of Rs.115,62,56,550/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer made following disallowances :- 01 Disallowance u/s 37(1) excessive and 114,74,95,731/- unreasonable cane purchase price paid for purchase of Sugarcane 02 Addition on account of Sale of Sugar at 69,86,180/- concessional rate 03 VSI contribution 17,74,638/- 3. Being aggrieved by the above disallowances, an appeal was filed before the NFAC, who vide impugned order deleted the addition on account of excess and unreasonable sugarcane purchase price of Rs.114,74,95,731/- relying on the Budget Speech of Hon’ble Finance Minister.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026