SHRI VITTHAL SSK LTD.,SOLAPUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, SOLAPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 579/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 July 2023AY 2009-104 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s approach of granting relief on one issue and confirming others without proper discussion was illegal and unreasonable. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society running a sugarcane factory, filed its return showing Nil income after set off of losses. The Assessing Officer made significant additions, including for excessive cane purchase price and sale of sugar at concessional rates.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) correctly adjudicated the appeal by granting relief on one ground and confirming others without proper analysis. The legality of the additions made by the Assessing Officer.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 37(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Hearing: 12.06.2023Pronounced: 04.07.2023

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 14.03.2023 for the assessment year 2009-10.

2.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a Co- operative Society engaged in the business of running of sugarcane factory. The Return of Income for the assessment year 2009-10 was filed on 29.09.2009 and the same was revised on 08.06.2010 at Rs.Nil income after claiming set off of the brought forward losses. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Solapur (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 16.12.2011 passed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) at a total income of Rs.115,62,56,550/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer made following disallowances :- 01 Disallowance u/s 37(1) excessive and 114,74,95,731/- unreasonable cane purchase price paid for purchase of Sugarcane 02 Addition on account of Sale of Sugar at 69,86,180/- concessional rate 03 VSI contribution 17,74,638/- 3. Being aggrieved by the above disallowances, an appeal was filed before the NFAC, who vide impugned order deleted the addition on account of excess and unreasonable sugarcane purchase price of Rs.114,74,95,731/- relying on the Budget Speech of Hon’ble Finance Minister.

More judgments on Section 37(1)

All 6,995 judgments and leading authorities on Section 37(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →