CENTRE OF STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-(1), PUNE, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the deposits represented renewed fixed deposits and not fresh unexplained money. The addition made under Section 68 was incorrect, and the requirement of Form 10B was not relevant for this specific addition.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, did not file a return of income. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 8,26,756/- as unexplained money on deposits. The NFAC confirmed this addition, citing non-filing of Form 10B.
What were the issues?
Whether the fixed deposits made by a charitable trust are unexplained money, and if the addition under Section 68 is justified without considering the nature of the deposits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 03.03.2023 for the assessment year 2012-13.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a Public Charitable Trust engaged in undertaking researches in Social Sciences. The appellant trust was duly registered u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). No regular Return of Income was filed for the assessment year under consideration. However, on receipt of information that the assessee trust made a deposit of Rs.8,26,756/- with Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd., Pune and also received interest on such deposit of Rs.1,41,186/-, issued a notice u/s 148 on 29.03.2019. In response to the said notice, the appellant trust had filed the return of income disclosing Rs.Nil income. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) Ward-1, Pune (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 13.11.2019 bringing the deposits of Rs.8,26,756/- as unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act. 3. Being aggrieved by the above assessment order, an appeal was filed before the NFAC, who vide impugned order confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer by holding that no Form No.10B had been filed before the Assessing Authority. 4. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026