SHIROL TALUKA URDU SHIKSHAK ,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order dated 13-05-2022 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2017-18.

The appeal is time barred by 323 days. The assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay. I am satisfied with the reasons so stated. The delay is condoned and the appeal is admitted for disposal on merits.

I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed ex parte u/s.144 of the Act determining total income at Rs.41,21,000/-. The ld. CIT(A) also passed the ex parte in the absence of the assessee. In view of the facts obtaining in the instant case where both the assessment as well as the first appellate orders have been passed in the absence of the assessee, I am of the opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the AO with a direction to pass the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. I order accordingly. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support of its point of view in the fresh assessment.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.