RAJARAM VYANKTESH POGUL,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 789/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 July 2023AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that it would be just and fair to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the Assessing Officer. The AO was directed to pass a fresh assessment order after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessment order and the first appellate order were both passed ex parte, meaning in the absence of the assessee. The assessee's appeal arose from an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether ex parte orders passed by the revenue authorities without providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee are sustainable. The need for a fair hearing in assessment proceedings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. Shingte
For Respondent: Shri Ajay D. Kulkarni

आदेश / ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, VP:

1.

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the ex parte order dated 02-05-2023 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2011-12.

2.

I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed u/s.144 r.w.s.147 of the Act determining total income at Rs.17,78,500/-. The ld. CIT(A) also passed ex parte order in the absence of the assessee. In view of the facts obtaining in the instant case where both the assessment as well as the first appellate orders have been passed in the absence of the assessee, I am of the opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the AO with a direction to pass the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. I order accordingly. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support of his case in the fresh assessment.

3.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 26th July, 2023.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →