SHRI ASHOK KESHAVRAO THUBE,NASHIK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), NASHIK, NASHIK

PDF · subscribers
ITA 643/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 August 2023AY 2012-134 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the appeal to be remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration based on additional evidence filed by the assessee. The lower authorities had doubted the assessee's business claims.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not file a regular return for AY 2012-13 but later filed one after a notice for cash deposits of Rs. 37,55,630/-. The AO added this amount to income, disbelieving the assessee's explanation of business receipts from stone metal and truck plying.

What were the issues?

Whether the cash deposits were genuine business receipts and if additional evidence should be considered for re-examination by the AO.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 147,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. Shingte
For Respondent: Shri A. K. Mahala
Hearing: 03.08.2023Pronounced: 07.08.2023

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 14.03.2023 for the assessment year 2012-13.

2.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is an individual. No regular Return of Income for the assessment year 2012-13 was filed by the assessee. However, the Assessing Officer Rs.37,55,630/- in the bank account with Dena Bank, Deolali Camp, Nashik, issued a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) on 30.03.2019. In response to the notice u/s 148, the appellant had filed the return of income on 13.11.2019 disclosing returned income of Rs.3,35,124/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(4), Nashik (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 26.12.2019 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Act at a total income of Rs.40,90,754/-. While doing so, the Assessing Officer made addition on account of cash deposits in the bank account of Rs.37,55,630/- rejecting the explanation of the assessee that the cash deposits were made out of the business receipt from the business of sale of stone metal and truck plying. The Assessing Officer had disbelieved that the appellant was carrying on the business of sale of stone metal and truck plying. According to the Assessing Officer, the appellant had failed to prove that the appellant was carrying on the above businesses by leading necessary evidence.

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →