THE SUVARTA ALLIANCE MINISTRIES TRUST,NANDURBAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, AURANGABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 706/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 August 2023AY 2010-114 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the NFAC had confirmed the Assessing Officer's findings without independent application of mind or considering the assessee's written submissions, violating principles of natural justice. Therefore, the matter was remitted to the NFAC for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust registered under section 12A, had its assessment reopened after the initial assessment accepted Nil income. The Assessing Officer made additions for alleged unexplained expenditure and for not charging additional fees for computer courses, denying exemption under section 11.

What were the issues?

Whether the NFAC properly adjudicated the appeal without applying its own mind and considering the assessee's submissions, and whether the additions made by the Assessing Officer were justified.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 11,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO

For Respondent: Smt. Sonal Sonkavde
Hearing: 22.08.2023Pronounced: 25.08.2023

ORDER

PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:

1.

This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘NFAC’] dated 10.05.2023 for the assessment year 2010-11.

2.

Briefly, the facts of the case are that the appellant is a charitable trust formed with the object of rendering educational activities. It was duly registered under the provisions of section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’). The Return of Income for the assessment year 2010-11 was filed on 20.09.2010 Rs.Nil income. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 07.12.2012 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act accepted the returned income. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened u/s 147 on 30.03.2017 by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 30.03.2017. In response to the notice u/s 148, the appellant filed a letter dated 01.06.2017 stating that the original return of income filed on 20.09.2010 may be treated as return of income in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption Circle, Aurangabad (‘the Assessing Officer’) vide order dated 07.12.2017 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act at a total income of Rs.35,35,157/- denying the exemption u/s 11 of the Act. While doing so, the Assessing Officer brought to tax the alleged unexplained expenditure of Rs.9,80,000/- + Rs.15,000/- incurred by the appellant trust on the payment made to M/s. Educomp Solution Ltd.. The Assessing Officer also brought to tax a sum of Rs.34,22,157/- by holding that the appellant trust should have charged additional fees for students in respect of computer course undertaken by the M/s. Educomp Solution Ltd..

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →