SANJEEVANI ABHAY OSWAL,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found it just and fair to set aside the ex parte order. The matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex parte by the CIT(A) for non-compliance despite repeated opportunities. The assessee contended that adequate opportunity of hearing was not provided.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex parte without providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘B’ PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
आदेश / ORDER
PER R.S. SYAL, VP :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dt. 22-11-2022 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.
It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed u/s.153C r.w.s.143(3) of the Act determining total income at Rs.9,77,000/-. The ld. CIT(A), in para Nos. 7 of the impugned order, noted that: `The above discussion suggests that in spite of repeated opportunities, the appellant did not file any written submission in support of grounds raised…………. The, the ld. CIT(A) noted in para 8 that in the given circumstances, there was no other option left with him but to decide the appeal on the basis of documents that have been submitted by the assessee. Thereafter, he dismissed the appeal of the assessee ex parte qua the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that adequate opportunity of hearing was not provided by the ld. first appellate authority.
After hearing both the sides and considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set- aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. We order accordingly.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 21st August, 2023.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026