ASEEM TAKYAR,GURGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the submissions and for the sake of justice, decided to remit the issue back to the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO is directed to decide the issue on its merit after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order by the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2012-13. The original assessment was completed under Section 147/144 due to the assessee's non-cooperation and non-compliance with notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment completed under Section 147/144 due to non-cooperation should be set aside and remanded to the AO for decision on merit after proper hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’: NEW DELHI
(Assessment Year: 2012-13) Aseem Takyar, vs. ITO, Ward 1 (5), 144, Phase 1, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon. Gurgaon – 122 016 (Haryana). (PAN : AAHPT9424A) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : Shri Bhimanshu Kansal, Advocate REVENUE BY : Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 01.07.2025 Date of Order : 01.07.2025 O R D E R
PER S.RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT (A)] dated 08.09.2023 for Assessment Year 2012-13.
At the time of hearing, it is brought to our notice that the assessment was completed under section 147/144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) due to non-cooperation of the assessee. It is brought to our notice that assessee has filed the appeal before the ld. CIT (A) and even before ld. CIT (A), assessee has not complied to the various notices issued by the ld. CIT (A) 3. After considering the submissions of the assessee, for the sake of overall justice, we are inclined to remit this issue to the file of AO. It is directed to AO to decide the issue on merit after giving proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee. At the same time, we direct the assessee to cooperate with the lower authorities also.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on this 1st day of July, 2025 after the conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026