MR. VISHAL ASHOK CAUGERA,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3), PUNE, PUNE

PDF
ITA 922/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 August 2023AY 2016-174 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL

For Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Srivastava

आदेश / ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, VP:

This appeal by the assessee arises out of the ex parte order

dated 28-07-2023 passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal

Centre, Delhi u/s.250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also

called ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2016-17.

2.

There is no appearance from the side of assessee despite notice.

I am, therefore, proceeding to dispose off the appeal ex parte qua the

assessee.

3.

It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed u/s.

143(3) of the Act determining total income at Rs.28,73,170/- as

2 ITA No. 922/PUN/2023 Vishal Ashok Chugera

against the returned income at Rs.18,59,990/-. The ld. CIT(A), in

para No.4.4 of the impugned order, noted that: `Considering the

above facts and the records available, it is established that the

appellant was provided many opportunities of being heard.

However, the appellant has remained noncompliant. No material

fact has been brought on record in support of the grounds of appeal

or to rebut the findings of the Assessing Officer (AO). The appellant

in spite of being given ample opportunities during appellate

proceedings, failed to offer any explanation/supporting documents in

respect of grounds of appeal raised by the appellant. I have carefully

considered the assessment order and since the appellant has not

furnished any documentary evidence in support of the grounds of

appeal filed by the appellant, I do not find any reason to interfere

with the order of the AO.’ He thus eventually dismissed the appeal

of the assessee. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has approached the

Tribunal.

4.

After hearing the ld. DR and considering the entirety of facts

and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered opinion that it

would be just and fair if the impugned order, being an ex parte, is

set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a

direction to decide the appeal afresh as per law after allowing a

3 ITA No. 922/PUN/2023 Vishal Ashok Chugera

reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. I order

accordingly.

5.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 29th August, 2023.

Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 29th August, 2023 सतीश आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��थ� / The Respondent 2. 3. The Pr.CIT concerned 4. DR, ITAT, ‘SMC’ Bench, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 5.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,

// Tue Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

4 ITA No. 922/PUN/2023 Vishal Ashok Chugera

Date 1. Draft dictated on 29-08-2023 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 29-08-2023 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *