M/S.NILON'S ENTERPRISES,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 639/PUN/2022Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 September 2023AY 2016-172 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the assessee's claim of not receiving notices and the Revenue's no objection to a remand. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to present evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed against a penalty imposed under Section 271D. The CIT(A) confirmed the penalty ex-parte after the assessee failed to respond to multiple hearing notices.

What were the issues?

Whether the penalty under Section 271D was rightly imposed ex-parte. Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271D

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Pathak

आदेश / ORDER

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 27-06-2022 passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (“NFAC”) for assessment year 2016-17, wherein, penalty imposed by the AO u/s. 271D of the Act and confirmed the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi ex-parte of the assessee.

2.

At the outset, it is noted from para 4 of the impugned order, wherein, the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi issued three notices dated 02-02-2021, 01-12- 2021 and 13-06-2022 intimating the assessee the dates of hearing on 12- 02-2021, 14-12-2021 and 17-06-2022, respectively and there was no compliance by the assessee in response to such notices as it is established through remarks column in para 4 of the impugned order. The ld. AR submits that no notice was received by the assessee and now the assessee is ready to comply with the notices and requested to give another opportunity for the assessee to prosecute its case before the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. The ld. DR reported no objection in remanding the matter to the file of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. Thus, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi for its fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

3.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20th September, 2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; ददिांक / Dated : 20th September, 2023. रधव आदेश की प्रधतधलधप अग्रेधर्त / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The concerned CIT, Pune. धवभागीय प्रधतधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “सी” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “C” Bench, Pune. गार्ा फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्याधपत प्रधत// True Copy// आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER,

वररष्ठ धिजी सधचव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

More judgments on Section 271D

All 1,725 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271D →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →