M/S.NILON'S ENTERPRISES,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE -2, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's claim of not receiving notices and the Revenue's no objection to a remand. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee to present evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against a penalty imposed under Section 271D. The CIT(A) confirmed the penalty ex-parte after the assessee failed to respond to multiple hearing notices.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty under Section 271D was rightly imposed ex-parte. Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश / ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 27-06-2022 passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (“NFAC”) for assessment year 2016-17, wherein, penalty imposed by the AO u/s. 271D of the Act and confirmed the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi ex-parte of the assessee.
At the outset, it is noted from para 4 of the impugned order, wherein, the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi issued three notices dated 02-02-2021, 01-12- 2021 and 13-06-2022 intimating the assessee the dates of hearing on 12- 02-2021, 14-12-2021 and 17-06-2022, respectively and there was no compliance by the assessee in response to such notices as it is established through remarks column in para 4 of the impugned order. The ld. AR submits that no notice was received by the assessee and now the assessee is ready to comply with the notices and requested to give another opportunity for the assessee to prosecute its case before the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. The ld. DR reported no objection in remanding the matter to the file of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. Thus, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi for its fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20th September, 2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; ददिांक / Dated : 20th September, 2023. रधव आदेश की प्रधतधलधप अग्रेधर्त / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The concerned CIT, Pune. धवभागीय प्रधतधिधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, “सी” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “C” Bench, Pune. गार्ा फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्याधपत प्रधत// True Copy// आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER,
वररष्ठ धिजी सधचव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
More judgments on Section 271D
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Harshit Singhania Buildcon, RaipurITA 560/RPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Jalaram Finance, Borsad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(4), PetladITA 1785/AHD/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026