LAXMAN PATWARDHAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION,NASHIK vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

PDF
ITA 817/PUN/2023Status: HeardITAT Pune21 September 20233 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. Phadke
For Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel

आदेश / ORDER

PER R.S. SYAL, VP : These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the

separate orders dt. 29-09-2022 passed by the CIT (Exemption),

Pune, rejecting the approval u/s.80G(5) and the registration

u/s.12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the

Act’).

2.

Both the appeals are time barred by 229 days. The assessee has

filed affidavit in support of the delay. We are convinced with the

same. The delay is condoned and the appeals are admitted for

disposal on merits.

2 ITA Nos.817 & 818/PUN/2023 Laxman Patwardhan Charitable Foundation

3.

The assessee claims to be engaged in Charitable activities. It

filed requisite forms for granting registration u/s.12AA and

approval u/s.80G respectively. In order to verify the genuineness of

the activities carried out by the assessee, some notices were issued

to the assessee through the ITBA Portal on

26-07-2022, 03-08-2022 and 17-09-2022 requiring the uploading of

certain documents. In the absence of any compliance, the ld.

CIT(Exemption) chose to reject the applications. Against the said

rejection, the assessee has approached the Tribunal.

4.

The ld. AR submitted that the assessee had submitted its

response to the ld. CIT(E), whose copy has also been placed on

record. However, the ld. CIT(E) chose to reject the applications

filed by the assessee, without examining such reply. In the given

circumstances and considering the prayer of the assessee, we are of

the considered opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned

orders are set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the ld.

CIT(E) with a direction to decide the issues afresh as per law after

allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. We

order accordingly. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to

lead any fresh evidence in support of its point of view in the fresh

proceedings.

3 ITA Nos.817 & 818/PUN/2023 Laxman Patwardhan Charitable Foundation

5.

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

purposes.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 21st September, 2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 21st September, 2023 सतीश आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��थ� / The respondent 2. The Pr.CIT concerned 3. 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 5.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 20-09-2023 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 20-09-2023 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *