ROTARY CLUB OF POONA AIRPORT CHARITABLE TRUST,PUNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was given an unreasonably short period to respond, violating principles of natural justice. The order of the CIT (Exemption) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Rotary Club of Poona Airport Charitable Trust, appealed against an order by the CIT (Exemption). The assessee contended they were not given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the CIT's notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was provided with a reasonable opportunity to be heard and respond to the notice issued by the CIT (Exemption) as per the principles of natural justice and CBDT SOP.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
ORDER
PER INTURI RAMA RAO, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Pune [‘the CIT, Exemption’] dated 31.05.2023 for the assessment year 2023-24 passed u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’).
At the outset, it is submitted that the appellant was not given reasonable opportunity to respond to the notice issued by the ld. CIT, Exemption. On perusal of the impugned order, it is clear that the appellant was asked to furnish certain information vide letter dated 23.05.2023 requesting the appellant society to file the details on or before 29.05.2023 thereby giving a short period of time i.e. less than one week, which is against the Standard Operative Procedure (‘SOP’) issued by the CBDT dated 19.11.2020, wherein, minimum period of 15 days is required to be given to the assessee to comply with notices u/s 142(1) from the date of issue of the notice. Recently, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited vs. ITO in W.P.(C) 8870/2023 & CM Nos.33516-17/2023 dated 05.07.2023 taking note of this SOP held that the grant of insufficient time to respond the notice violates the principles of natural justice and, therefore, set-aside the assessment. Thus, it is clear that the appellant was given unreasonably short period of time to respond to the notices, which is against the principles of natural justice. Therefore, we set-aside the order passed by the ld. CIT, Exemption and restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT, Exemption for fresh disposal in accordance with law after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026