VITHALDAS TRIBHUWANDAS BAGADIYA,JALNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 807/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 October 2023AY 2009-104 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the land acquisition award was made on 02.02.2010, and the land was taken over on 8th September 2010. Therefore, there was no transfer of capital asset in the previous year relevant to AY 2009-10, and no Long Term Capital Gain arose for this assessment year.

What were the facts?

The assessee's land was acquired by the Government, and compensation was awarded. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings and calculated Long Term Capital Gain. The CIT(A) upheld the assessment order.

What were the issues?

Whether Long Term Capital Gain arising from land acquisition is taxable in AY 2009-10 when the award and possession were taken in a subsequent financial year.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147,Section 148,Section 45,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

For Appellant: Shri M.K.Kulkarani – AR
For Respondent: Shri M.G.Jasnani – DR
Hearing: 04/10/2023Pronounced: 05/10/2023

ORDER

PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:

1.

This an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[NFAC] under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2009-10 dated 18.05.2023 emanating from the assessment order under section 144 r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 17.03.2016 for A.Y.2009-10.

2.

Heard both the parties and perused the records. Vithaldas Tribhuwandas Bagadiya [A]

3.

The assessee is an individual having income from salary and other sources. The assessee had filed return of income for A.Y.2009-10 under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 26.10.2010 declaring total income at Rs.4,85,410/-. The Assessing Officer(AO) received information that Government of Maharashtra through Land Acquisition Officer, Jalna had acquired land of the assessee for the purpose of setting up Industrial Zone. The Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation to the assessee of Rs.3,11,38,075/- for the assessee’s Land at Gat No.22, Village Nagewadi, District Jalna. The AO accordingly initiated proceedings under section 148 of the Act by issuing notice under section 148 of the Act dated 20.06.2014 for A.Y. 2009-10. The AO completed ex-party assessment and calculated the Long Term Capital Gain at Rs.1,53,52,952/-. Aggrieved by the assessment order, assessee filed appeal before the ld.CIT(A). The ld.CIT(A) upheld the assessment order, ignoring the submission of the assessee which has been reproduced by the ld.CIT(A) in the order.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →