VITHALDAS TRIBHUWANDAS BAGADIYA,JALNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, JALNA, JALNA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the land acquisition award was made on 02.02.2010, and the land was taken over on 8th September 2010. Therefore, there was no transfer of capital asset in the previous year relevant to AY 2009-10, and no Long Term Capital Gain arose for this assessment year.
What were the facts?
The assessee's land was acquired by the Government, and compensation was awarded. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings and calculated Long Term Capital Gain. The CIT(A) upheld the assessment order.
What were the issues?
Whether Long Term Capital Gain arising from land acquisition is taxable in AY 2009-10 when the award and possession were taken in a subsequent financial year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” :: PUNE
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
ORDER
PER DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM:
This an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[NFAC] under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2009-10 dated 18.05.2023 emanating from the assessment order under section 144 r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 17.03.2016 for A.Y.2009-10.
Heard both the parties and perused the records. Vithaldas Tribhuwandas Bagadiya [A]
The assessee is an individual having income from salary and other sources. The assessee had filed return of income for A.Y.2009-10 under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 26.10.2010 declaring total income at Rs.4,85,410/-. The Assessing Officer(AO) received information that Government of Maharashtra through Land Acquisition Officer, Jalna had acquired land of the assessee for the purpose of setting up Industrial Zone. The Land Acquisition Officer, had awarded compensation to the assessee of Rs.3,11,38,075/- for the assessee’s Land at Gat No.22, Village Nagewadi, District Jalna. The AO accordingly initiated proceedings under section 148 of the Act by issuing notice under section 148 of the Act dated 20.06.2014 for A.Y. 2009-10. The AO completed ex-party assessment and calculated the Long Term Capital Gain at Rs.1,53,52,952/-. Aggrieved by the assessment order, assessee filed appeal before the ld.CIT(A). The ld.CIT(A) upheld the assessment order, ignoring the submission of the assessee which has been reproduced by the ld.CIT(A) in the order.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026