K1 SECURITY SERVICES PVT LTD,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE- 1(1), BHUBANESWAR
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: MANISH AGARWAL
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MANISH AGARWAL MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.58/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2014-15 K I Security Services Pvt K I Security Services Pvt Vs. DCIT, Circle DCIT, Circle -1(1), Ltd., Ltd., Plot Plot No.268/269, No.268/269, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. Sarala Nagar, Cuttack Road, Sarala Nagar, Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar. PAN/GIR No PAN/GIR No.AADCK 2706 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR Date of Hearing : 22/0 04/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 22/0 /04/2024 O R D E R Per Bench
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the ord This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the ord This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld Addl CIT(A), Varanasi Addl CIT(A), Varanasi dated 14.12.2023 in Appeal No. in Appeal No.CIT(A), Bhubaneswar- -1/15806/2019-20 for the assessment year for the assessment year 2014-15.
None appeared for the assessee and Shri appeared for the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, S.C.Mohanty, Ld Sr. DR appeared for the revenue. appeared for the revenue.
P a g e 1 | 3
ITA No.58/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2014-15
We have considered the submission of ld Sr. DR. A perusal of the impugned order clearly shows that the ld Addl. CIT(A), Varanasi has passed exparte order without hearing the assessee. Also on perusal of the order shows that the ld Addl. CIT(A) has issued notices on four occasions, but there was no response from the side of the assessee. We also observe that during the assessment proceedings, the assessee has not represented his case by producing the required documents or submissions. Therefore, the Assessing Officer has passed the order and made the addition due to non- representation. In view of above, in order to impart substantial justice, we deem it proper to set aside the order of the ld Addl.CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the ld Addl. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after allowing reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear before the ld Addl.CIT(A) and produce the documents, as required by him for denovo adjudication
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 22/04/2024.
Sd/- sd/- (Manish Agarwal) (George Mathan) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 22/04/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS)
P a g e 2 | 3
ITA No.58/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2014-15
Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : K I Security Services Pvt Ltd., Plot No.268/269, Sarala Nagar, Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar. 2. The Respondent: DCIT, Circle -1(1), Bhubaneswar. 3. The Add.CIT(A)- Varanasi 4. Pr.CIT, Bhubaneswar 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order
Sr.Pvt.secretary ITAT, Cuttack
P a g e 3 | 3
