SHYAM THAKUR,SUNDARGARH,ODISHA vs. ITO WARD-3,ROURKELA, ROURKELA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the AO for readjudication, directing the assessee to produce a sample of creditors and debtors for verification. If the sample confirms the submissions, the AO should proceed accordingly.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a scrap dealer, had received advances from customers and amounts from sundry debtors. The AO disallowed these amounts as the parties did not appear in person, despite providing confirmation letters. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of amounts received from creditors and debtors is justified solely on the ground of non-appearance of parties, despite submission of confirmation letters.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
O R D E R This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 12.01.2024 in DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1059667854(1) for the assessment year 2014-2015.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee is a scrap dealer. It was the submission that the assessee had taken advances from the customers to an extent of Rs.15 lakhs and Rs.8,56,514/- being amounts received from various sundry debtors. It was the submission that the AO had issued notices u/s.131 of the Act to the creditors and debtors, who did not appear but had filed confirmation letters. It was the submission that though the confirmation letters have been produced, the AO on the ground that the parties did not appear, made the disallowance of both creditors to an extent of Rs.15 lakhs and recovery from the debtors to the extent of Rs.8,56,514/-. It was the submission that the ld. CIT(A) without considering the explanation of the assessee confirmed the order of the AO. It was the prayer that the addition made by the ld. AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) may be deleted.
In reply, ld. Sr. DR submitted that the show cause notice was issued to the assessee and the assessee did not respond to the same. It was the submission that filing of the confirmation letters does not prove the genuineness of the transaction. It was the submission that the addition as made by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) is liable to be upheld.
I have considered the rival submission. Considering the fact that the creditors and debtors have filed their confirmation letters in regard to the transaction of the assessee and also considering the fact that the number of creditors are more than 75 and the number of debtors are more than 20, it shows that if a physical verification is to be done, then the AO will be stuck with the more than nearly 100 people. This would in fact to be an absolute difficulty. It is an admitted fact that the confirmation letters have been received from both the creditors and debtors. This being so, in the interest of justice, issues in this appeal are restored to the file of AO for readjudication. The AO shall direct the assessee to produce sample number of creditors and debtors as chosen by the AO for verification. If the sample confirms with the confirmation letters which have been submitted then the AO shall proceed thereafter in accordance with law. In these circumstances, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of ld. AO for readjudication afresh after granting the assessee sufficient opportunity of being heard to substantiate its case.
More judgments on Section 131
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nimit Agrawal, Raipur vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, RaipurITA 622/RPR/2026[2020-21]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nimit Agrawal, Raipur vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, RaipurITA 621/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026
- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026