M/S K.D.PATIL & CONSTRUCTION,PANVEL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-PANVEL, PANVEL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 899/PUN/2023Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 November 2023AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's argument that they did not have sufficient time to present their case before the Assessing Officer. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee's case was initially selected for limited scrutiny and later converted to complete scrutiny. The assessment order was passed shortly after the detailed questionnaire was issued, leaving the assessee with insufficient time to respond.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was provided with adequate opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer during the assessment proceedings.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Hari Krishan

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 21-06-2023 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (“NFAC”) for assessment year 2015-16.

2.

At the outset, the ld. AR, Shri Hari Krishan prayed to remand the matter to the file of AO for its fresh consideration in view of fact that the assessee has no opportunity in assessment proceedings as there was no sufficient time for compliance in response to the notice issued by the AO. On perusal of the assessment order, we find force in the arguments of ld. AR that initially the case of the assessee was selected for limited scrutiny and thereafter converted to complete scrutiny by issuing a letter dated 15- 12-2017 seeking to furnish complete details in response to the detailed questionnaire. Admittedly, the assessment order was passed on 28-12- 2017 which is in our opinion, the assessee has no sufficient time to prosecute its case before the AO. The ld. DR reported no objection in remanding the matter to the file of AO. Therefore, taking into consideration the submissions of ld. AR and in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of AO for its fresh consideration. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.

3.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 16th November, 2023.

Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे / Pune; दिनाांक / Dated : 16th November, 2023. रदव आदेश की प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधर्ि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. दवभागीय प्रदतदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, “ए” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्यादपत प्रदत// True Copy// आिेशानुसार / BY ORDER,

वररष्ठ दनजी सदचव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →