ALUMINIUM PROFILES LIMITED,PUNE vs. THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC), DELHI, PUNE
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
आदेश / ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM :
This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 28-06-2023 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi for assessment year 2015-16.
At the outset, we note that the assessee is a domestic company engaged in the business of manufacturing of Aluminium Extruded of building construction, Electrical industries, and Transport Sections. The
2 ITA No. 1121/PUN/2023, A.Y. 2015-16
assessee filed return of income declaring a total loss of Rs.1,05,43,149/- which was processed u/s. 143(1) of the Act. Thereafter, the case was selected for complete scrutiny, notices u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued. There was no compliance by the assessee in respect to such statutory notices as it is evident from para 6 of the assessment order. The AO by issuing a final show cause notice, having found no compliance thereto, determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.1,97,26,941/- vide its order dated 22-12-2017 passed u/s. 144 of the Act to his best judgment. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, it is noted that no compliance were made as it is evident from para 4 of the impugned order. The CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dismissed the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee for non- prosecution.
The ld. AR submits that the assessee could not be represented before the CIT(A) as no notices were received and pleaded one more opportunity may be afforded to the assessee as the assessee is ready to prosecute its case before the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi. The ld. DR vehemently opposed the same and drew our attention to para 6 of the assessment order and para 4 of the impugned order and argued that if Tribunal wishes to grant an opportunity, the assessee may be directed to prosecute its case before the CIT(A) without fail.
Having heard both the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find there was no representation before the AO as well as the CIT(A) which clearly establishes that there was no opportunity for the assessee to contest its case. Therefore, taking into facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of ld. AR and ld. DR and
3 ITA No. 1121/PUN/2023, A.Y. 2015-16
in the interest of justice, we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of NFAC, Delhi for its fresh consideration. We make it clear that the assessee shall comply the notice issued by NFAC, Delhi without fail. In case of any such failure, the NFAC, Delhi is liberty to pass order on merits. The assessee is liberty to file evidences, if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30th November, 2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (G.D. Padmahshali) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; ददनाांक / Dated : 30th November, 2023. रवि
आदेश की प्रतततलतप अग्रेतषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. तवभागीय प्रतततनति, आयकर अपीलीय अतिकरण, “ए” बेंच, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गार्ड फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5. //सत्यातपत प्रतत// True Copy// आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
िररष्ठ वनजी सविि / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
