SHRI CHAITANYA KANIFNATH MAHARAJ TRUST,AHMEDNAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the ex parte order passed by the CIT(Exemption) and restored the matter back to the CIT's file. The CIT was directed to decide the issue afresh after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust's application for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) was denied by the CIT(Exemption) through an ex parte order. The assessee appealed this order, claiming insufficient opportunity to submit a reply.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of registration by the CIT(Exemption) was justified without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee. The procedural fairness in the ex parte order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
आदेश / ORDER
PER R.S. SYAL, VP :
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29-08-2023 passed by the ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune denying the benefit of registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called ‘The Act’) by means of an ex parte order.
We have heard the ld. DR and gone through the relevant material on record. There is no appearance form the side of assessee despite notice. However, the written submissions have been filed on behalf of the assessee. We are, therefore, proceeding to dispose off the appeal on merits ex parte qua the assessee.
It is an undisputed position that the ld. CIT(Exemption) dismissed the assessee’s appeal ex parte for want of assessee’s participation. The assessee, vide his Ground of appeal, has also assailed that sufficient opportunity was not given to submit the reply. In view of these peculiar facts and circumstances, we are satisfied that the ends of justice would meet adequately if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is restored to the file of ld.CIT(Exemption). We order accordingly and direct him to decide the issue afresh as per law after allowing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 22nd December, 2023.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi)
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ahmednagar Historical Museum and Research… vs CIT (Exemption), AhilyanagarITA 1969/PUN/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Ahmednagar Historical Museum and Research… vs CIT (Exemption), PuneITA 1968/PUN/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri 108 Sudharm Nang Ahinsa Trust, Jaipur vs CIT(E), JaipurITA 372/JPR/2026[NA]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Nathu Ka Foundation, Jaipur vs CIT (Exemption), JaipurITA 1212/JPR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026