MRS SUREKHA HANUMANTRAO PAWAR,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7, PUNE, PUNE
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B” : PUNE
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “B” : PUNE BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.1210/PUN/2023 Assessment Year 2012-13 The Dy. CIT, Circle-7, Mrs.Surekha Hanumantrao Room No.316, Aayakar Pawar, Sr No.47, Sunita vs Sadan, Bodhi Towers, Nagar, Vadagaon Sheri, Salisbury Park, Gultekadi, Pune-411014. Pune – 411037. PAN: ACMPP8531F Maharashtra. Appellant Respondent For Assessee : Shri Chandrasekhar L.S. – AR For Revenue : Shri B.S.Rajpurohit - DR Date of Hearing : 19.12.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 19.12.2023
ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. :
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2012- 2013, arises against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short [the “NFAC”] Delhi’s Din and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1056323770(1), dated 20.09.2023, involving proceedings u/s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
Heard both the parties. Case file perused at length.
We notice at the outset that with the able assistance coming from both the sides that the “NFAC” herein has not decided the assessee’s lower appeal on merits as contemplated
2 ITA.No.1210/PUN./2023
under section 250(6) of the Act since it has proceeded to dismiss the same for statistical purpose as under: “5. I have perused the order appealed against, grounds of appeal and submission of the appellant. I find that the option under VSV Scheme of the appellant has been accepted by the PCIT-4, Pune and Form No.3 was issued on 02/11/2020. I find that the appellant has paid the taxes as per Form No.3 and has uploaded the Form No.4, however due to some technical error and the errors on the part of the appellant the Form No.5 is not yet issued. However, considering the request made by the appellant, the appeal filed by the appellant is allowed to be withdrawn. Thus the appeal is dismissed for statistical purposes as withdrawn. In the result, the appeal is treated as dismissed for 6. statistical purpose as withdrawn.” 3. The Revenue at this stage vehemently reiterated the fact that the assessee’s application seeking settlement under the “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme Act, 2020” is stated to be pending. That being the case, we are of the opinion that the learned “NFAC”s lower appellate discussion not adjudicating the assessee’s first appellate preferred against the assessment order causes serious prejudice to her interest as she has been deprived of her twin remedies seeking adjudication as per the normal provisions of the act as well as the settlement benefit under the foregoing amnesty scheme.
We thus conclude in larger interest of justice that the “NFAC” takes up the assessee’s lower appellate once again for its decision on merits as per law preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing subject to the final outcome
3 ITA.No.1210/PUN./2023
of her settlement petition under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad se Viswas Scheme”; as the case may be.
This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purpose in above terms. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19.12.2023.
Sd/- Sd/- (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Pune, Dated 19th December, 2023 SGR/- Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The NFAC, Delhi. 4. The CIT-2, Pune. 5. DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. 6. Guard File. BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Pune.
