INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR vs. NAVODAYA TRUST, BHUBANESWAR
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the return was filed within the extended due date as per CBDT circular, making the assessee eligible for exemption. Therefore, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue were rejected.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust claimed exemption under Section 11, which was denied by the Assessing Officer due to late filing of the return. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, and the revenue appealed.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 11 when the return of income is filed within the extended due date prescribed by a CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: MANISH AGARWAL
O R D E R Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the ld against the order of the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Vadodara 1, Vadodara dated 19.1.2024 in Appeal No. in Appeal No.NFAC/2021- 22/10235479 for the assessment year 2022-23.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of income on 2.11.2022, which was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act dated income on 2.11.2022, which was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act dated income on 2.11.2022, which was processed u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 4.4.2023, wherein, exempt 4.4.2023, wherein, exemption claimed by the assessee u/s.11 has been ion claimed by the assessee u/s.11 has been denied and the gross receipts has been taxed. Against this, the assessee denied and the gross receipts has been taxed. Against this, the assessee denied and the gross receipts has been taxed. Against this, the assessee P a g e 1 | 3 had preferred appeal before the ld CIT(A), who vide his order dated 19.1.2024 has allowed the exemption claimed by the assessee. Being aggrieved, the revenue is in appeal before us.
Before us, ld CIT DR supported the order of the Assessing Officer and submitted that the return was filed late as the due date for filing the return was 31.10.2022 and the return of income was filed on 2.11.2022 alongwith Form 10B of the Act. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled to claim exemption allowed to it u/s.12A of the Act.
Per contra, ld AR of the assessee stated that CBDT vide its circular No.20/2022 dated 26.10.2022 has extended the time limit for filing the return of income from 31.10.22 to 7.11.2022 and furnished copy of the CBDT Circular, which is available in paper book at Page-1. He submitted that since the due date of filing of return was already extended and the return of income has been filed within the due date, therefore, the assessee is eligible for exemption available to it. He further drew our attention to page 1 of the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act, wherein, it is mentioned against Item extended due date is 7.11.2022 and the date of filing is 2.11.2022. Thus, he requested to confirm the order of the ld CIT(A) in allowing the exemption to the assessee.
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the record of the case. On perusal of CBDT circular No.20/2022(supra) we find that the P a g e 2 | 3 date of filing of return u./s.139(1) of the Act was extended upto 7.11.2022 for the assessment year 2022-23. In the instant case, the assessee has filed its return of income alongwith Form 10B on 2.11.2022, which is within the time limited prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act and also within the extended time limit by CBDT. Therefore, we are in agreement with the observations of ld CIT(A) that the assessee is entitled for exemption u/s.12A of the Act and reject the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue.
In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 03/06/2024.
SD/- SD/- (George Mathan) (Manish Agarwal) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 03/06/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), Bhubaneswar 2. The Respondent: Navodaya Trust, Plot No.1881(3 and 4), Infront of BPCL Petrol Pump, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar 3. The Addl.JCIT(A)-1, Vadodara 4. Pr.CIT, Bhubaneswar 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. By order //True Copy//
Sr.Pvt.secretary ITAT, Cuttack
P a g e 3 | 3
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026