SANATAN NAYAK,MADHUBAN, PARADIP vs. I.T.O, PARADIP- WARD, INCOME TAX OFFICE, MADHUBAN, PARADIP
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK ‘SMC’ BENCH, CUTTACK , CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.275/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2016-17 Sanatan Nayak, Sanatan Nayak, Vs. ITO, ITO, Paradeep Paradeep Ward, Ward, At-Plot No.31, Gjai Colony, Plot No.31, Gjai Colony, Paradeep. Paradeep. Madhuban, Paradeep. Madhuban, Paradeep. PAN/GIR No PAN/GIR No.AEIPN 9617 G (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : None (Adjournment application) : None (Adjournment application) Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR , ld Sr DR Date of Hearing : 29/0 08/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 29/0 /08/2024 O R D E R This is an appeal filed by the assessee aga This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld inst the order of the ld CIT(A), CIT(A), NFAC, NFAC, Delhi Delhi dated 12.5.2023 in in Appeal Appeal No. No.CIT(A), Cuttack/10253/2018 Cuttack/10253/2018-19 for the assessment year 2016- -17.
None appeared for appeared for the assessee. However, an adjournment petition However, an adjournment petition has been filed requesting to adjourn the matter to some other date. has been filed requesting to adjourn the matter to some other date. has been filed requesting to adjourn the matter to some other date. The adjournment application filed by the assessee is rejected. adjournment application filed by the assessee is rejected. adjournment application filed by the assessee is rejected. Shri S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR represented on behalf of the revenue. represented on behalf of the revenue.
A perusal of appeal folder shows that a defect notice was issued as A perusal of appeal folder shows that a defect notice was issued as A perusal of appeal folder shows that a defect notice was issued as early as on 21.6.2024. Till today, the assessee has not thought it early as on 21.6.2024. Till today, the assessee has not thought it early as on 21.6.2024. Till today, the assessee has not thought it
P a g e 1 | 2
ITA No.275/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2016-17
appropriate to file the necessary affidavit for condoning the delay. As the defects have not been cured, the appeal is dismissed for defects.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 29/08/2024.
Sd/- (George Mathan) JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 29/08/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Sanatan Nayak, At-Plot No.31, Gjai Colony, Madhuban, Paradeep 2. The Respondent: ITO, Paradeep Ward, Paradeep. 3. The CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi 4. Pr.CIT, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order
Sr.Pvt. Secretary ITAT, Cuttack
P a g e 2 | 2
