JAGATPUR TRUCK OWNERS ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ITO,WARD-1,CUTTACK, CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not represent its appeals before the first appellate authority and was unaware of the delay raised. Therefore, the appeals were restored to the file of the Addl/JCIT(A) for readjudication after granting an adequate opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT against orders of the Addl/JCIT(A) for AY 2020-21 and 2021-22. There was a significant delay in filing appeals before the first appellate authority, and the assessee claimed non-receipt of notices. The assessee sought another opportunity to present its case.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case before the first appellate authority, given the delay and alleged non-receipt of notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: MANISH AGARWAL
O R D E R Per Bench These are These are appeals filed by the assessee against the filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld Addl/JCIT(A) Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh both dated dated 12.4.2024 in Appeal No.ADDL/JCIT(A) ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh/10002/2019-20 and 20 and No.ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh/10001/2020 Chandigarh/10001/2020-21 for the assessment years 2020 21 for the assessment years 2020-21 & 2021-22, respectively.
Shri P.K.Mishra, P.K.Mishra, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR appeared for the revenue.
P a g e 1 | 3 & 265/CTK/2024 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22
It was submitted by ld AR that for the assessment year 2020-2021, there was a delay of 525 days and for the assessment year 2021-22, a delay of 221 days in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority. It was the submission that the assessee had for both the assessment years filed rectification applications u/s.154 of the Act against the orders passed by the Assessing Officer. It was the submission that as the assessee had filed rectification applications, the assessee had not intimated the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority. It was the submission that the first appellate authority i.e. ld ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh had recorded the delay. It was the submission that the notice issued to the assessee had not been received by the assessee and consequently, the assessee was unable to make submission before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh. It was the submission that the assessee may be granted another opportunity to make the submissions. It was the submission that the assessee will co-operate in the set aside proceedings before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh.
Ld Sr DR did not have any serious objection to the request of ld AR of the assessee.
We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the assessee has not represented its appeals before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh and the delay has also not been answered by the assessee insofar as the assessee was also not aware of the issue of delay raised by P a g e 2 | 3 & 265/CTK/2024 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22 the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2,Chandigarh for readjudication after granting adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 27/08/2024.
(Manish Agarwal) (George Mathan) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 27/08/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Jagatpur Truck Owners Association, NH-5, Jagatpur, Cuttack 2. The Respondent: Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, CPA, Bengaluru 3. The Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh 4. Pr.CIT, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order
Sr.Pvt.Secretary ITAT, Cuttack
P a g e 3 | 3
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026