JAGATPUR TRUCK OWNERS ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ITO,WARD-1,CUTTACK, CUTTACK

PDF · subscribers
ITA 264/CTK/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 August 2024AY 2020-213 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not represent its appeals before the first appellate authority and was unaware of the delay raised. Therefore, the appeals were restored to the file of the Addl/JCIT(A) for readjudication after granting an adequate opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT against orders of the Addl/JCIT(A) for AY 2020-21 and 2021-22. There was a significant delay in filing appeals before the first appellate authority, and the assessee claimed non-receipt of notices. The assessee sought another opportunity to present its case.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case before the first appellate authority, given the delay and alleged non-receipt of notices.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

Before: MANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, Adv
For Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr
Hearing: 27/8Pronounced: 27/8

O R D E R Per Bench These are These are appeals filed by the assessee against the filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld Addl/JCIT(A) Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh both dated dated 12.4.2024 in Appeal No.ADDL/JCIT(A) ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh/10002/2019-20 and 20 and No.ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh/10001/2020 Chandigarh/10001/2020-21 for the assessment years 2020 21 for the assessment years 2020-21 & 2021-22, respectively.

2.

Shri P.K.Mishra, P.K.Mishra, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR appeared for the revenue.

P a g e 1 | 3 & 265/CTK/2024 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22

3.

It was submitted by ld AR that for the assessment year 2020-2021, there was a delay of 525 days and for the assessment year 2021-22, a delay of 221 days in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority. It was the submission that the assessee had for both the assessment years filed rectification applications u/s.154 of the Act against the orders passed by the Assessing Officer. It was the submission that as the assessee had filed rectification applications, the assessee had not intimated the delay in filing the appeals before the first appellate authority. It was the submission that the first appellate authority i.e. ld ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh had recorded the delay. It was the submission that the notice issued to the assessee had not been received by the assessee and consequently, the assessee was unable to make submission before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh. It was the submission that the assessee may be granted another opportunity to make the submissions. It was the submission that the assessee will co-operate in the set aside proceedings before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh.

4.

Ld Sr DR did not have any serious objection to the request of ld AR of the assessee.

5.

We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the assessee has not represented its appeals before the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh and the delay has also not been answered by the assessee insofar as the assessee was also not aware of the issue of delay raised by P a g e 2 | 3 & 265/CTK/2024 Assessment Years : 2020-21 & 2021-22 the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of the ld Addl/JCIT(A)-2,Chandigarh for readjudication after granting adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

6.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 27/08/2024.

1.

(Manish Agarwal) (George Mathan) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 27/08/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Jagatpur Truck Owners Association, NH-5, Jagatpur, Cuttack 2. The Respondent: Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, CPA, Bengaluru 3. The Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Chandigarh 4. Pr.CIT, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order

Sr.Pvt.Secretary ITAT, Cuttack

P a g e 3 | 3

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →