INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE, BARGARH vs. TORA SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, TORA SCS LTD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal falls within the purview of the CBDT Instruction regarding monetary limits for filing appeals. Since the tax effect is below Rs. 60 lakhs, the appeal deserves to be dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2020-2021. The tax effect in the appeal was Rs. 30,09,065, which is below the monetary limit prescribed by a recent CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect, considering the CBDT's monetary limits for pursuing appeals before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHANMANISH AGARWAL
Assessment Year :2020-2021 Income Tax Officer, Naidu Income Tax Officer, Naidu Vs. Tora Tora Service Service Cooperative Cooperative Sankul Sankul Building, Building, Railway Railway Socieity Limited, Tora SCS Socieity Limited, Tora SCS Station Road, Bargarh Station Road, Bargarh Ltd., PO: Tora, Bargarh Ltd., PO: Tora, Bargarh PAN/GIR No. No.AACAT 1501 E (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR DR Date of Hearing : 24/9/202 24 Date of Pronouncement : 24/9/20 024 O R D E R Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the revenue an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the ld against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 16.7.2024 in Appeal No. in Appeal No.NFAC/2019- 20/10175034 for the assessment year for the assessment year 2020-2021.
None appeared for appeared for the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR appeared for the revenue. appeared for the revenue.
When this matte When this matter was taken up for adjudication, it was pointed out it was pointed out to ld Sr DR that to ld Sr DR that in this appeal the tax effect is Rs.30,09,065/ this appeal the tax effect is Rs.30,09,065/-, which is below than the monetary limit prescribed vide Circular No.09/2024 dated below than the monetary limit prescribed vide Circular No.09/2024 dated below than the monetary limit prescribed vide Circular No.09/2024 dated P a g e 1 | 3 17.9.2024 issued by the Central Board Direct Taxes, wherein, it is stipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before the Tribunal in cases where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.60,00,000/- (Rupees sixty lakhs).
In reply, the ld. Sr DR did not dispute applicability of the recent CBDT circular and also tax effect being below Rs.60 lakhs in the assessee's case. He, however, left the issue to the Tribunal to pass appropriate order in the matter.
We have considered the rival submissions and perused the CBDT Instruction. We are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue falls within the purview of the CBDT Instruction cited (supra). It is not disputed by the Revenue that tax effect on the disputed addition is Rs. 30,09,065/-, which is less than Rs.60 lakhs, and therefore, keeping in view the above CBDT circular and provisions of section 268A of the Income Tax Act, we are of the view that the present appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed due to low tax effect. 6.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 24/9/2024.` Sd/- sd/- (Manish Agarwal) (George Mathan) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 24/9/2024 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) P a g e 2 | 3 Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The appellant;Income Tax Officer, Naidu Sankul Building, Railway Station Road, Bargarh 2. The Respondent: Tora Service Cooperative Socieity Limited, Tora SCS Ltd., PO: Tora, Bargarh 3. The CIT(A)- NFAC, Delhi 4. Pr.CIT, Sambalpur 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. By order //True Copy//
Sr.Pvt.Secretary ITAT, CUTTACK
P a g e 3 | 3
More judgments on Section 268A
- Income Tax Officer, Ajmer vs Hemant Kumar Sharma, AjmerITA 1506/JPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Income Tax Officer, Indore vs Aashta Doshi, IndoreITA 789/IND/2025[2024-25]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Income Tax Officer Ward -1(2)(3), Ahmedabad vs Khushal Madhavlal Darji, AhmedabadITA 82/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Mehsana vs Hemantkumar Faljibhai Chaudhary, MehsanaITA 475/AHD/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Dy. CIT-4(1), Indore vs Kiran Bajpai, IndoreITA 426/IND/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026