SHRI VISHNUBHAI MAFATLAL PATEL,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn under the VSV scheme, with liberty to seek restoration if the assessee fails to avail the VSV benefit for bonafide reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal. This withdrawal was sought due to the assessee exercising an option under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (VSV Scheme).
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee to avail benefits under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 5(2),Section 4(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE- & SHRI PRADIPKUMAR KEDIA
आदेश/O R D E R
PER RAJPAL YADAV, VICE-PRESIDENT:
The above appeals filed by the assessee arises from order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) dated 27.6.2018 for assessment year 2010-11.
When the matter was called for hearing, it is pointed out to the Bench that the assessee has moved an application under section 5(2) read with section 4(3) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for withdrawal of its above appeal. It is pleaded in the application that that assessee does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and it has complied with the requisite formalities, and consequently requested that the application for withdrawal of appeal may please be granted.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee in the circumstances narrated in the application.
In the light of written request made on behalf of the assessee by assessee’s representative, Shri Shashin Vishnubhai Patel, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for adjudication before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as being withdrawn under VSV scheme.
Order pronounced in the Court on 27th November, 2020 at Ahmedabad.
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026