SHRI SINDRATH KHETLAJI BHERUJI SIDROOP MAHADEV SANWARAJI MANDIR TRUST,SIROHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and set aside the order of the CIT(E). The matter was remanded back to the CIT(E) to decide the application afresh after providing the assessee with a reasonable opportunity to submit details and documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the rejection of its application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) had rejected the application ex-parte due to the assessee's failure to provide necessary documentation despite opportunities.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application ex-parte without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee. The need for a fair hearing for the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM
ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(E), Jaipur dated 28.08.2017 challenging the rejection of its application seeking registration u/s 12AA of the Act.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. The ld CIT/DR was heard and material on record was purused.
At the outset, it is noted that there has been a delay in filing the present appeal. After pursuing the affidavit of the assessee placed on record which is not disputed by the Revenue, we find that there was 2 Shri Sindrath Khetlaji Bheruji Sidroop Mahadve Sanwraji MandirTrust vs. CIT(E) reasonable cause for the delay in filing the present appeal and the delay is hereby condoned and the appeal of the assessee is admitted for adjudication.
On perusal of the order passed by the ld. CIT(E), it is observed that the application of the assessee was dismissed ex-parte by the ld. CIT(E). The ld CIT(E) has stated in his order that sufficient opportunities have been provided to the assessee to produce relevant information/documentation in support of its claim seeking registration U/s 12AA of the Act. However the assessee has failed to avail of such opportunity, accordingly, the application seeking registration was rejected by ld. CIT(E).
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, we belief that the assessee deserves one more opportunity to submit necessary details and documents in support of its claim for seeking registration U/s 12AA of the Act. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play, the matter is hereby set aside to the file of the ld. CIT(E) to decide the same afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
The assessee is also hereby directed to attend to the proceedings before the ld. CIT(E) and ensure in timely completion thereof as so directed by the ld. CIT(E).
3 Shri Sindrath Khetlaji Bheruji Sidroop Mahadve Sanwraji MandirTrust vs. CIT(E) In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 12/08/2021.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026