What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2017-18. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeal after it had been filed.

Agnelo Lawrence Santan Fernandes… vs ITO | ITAT Panaji 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI – VIRTUAL COURT

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI

For Appellant: Shri Agnelo Lawrence Santan

For Respondent: Shri Basavaraj H. Mallayya

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Bengaluru dated 25.02.2019 for the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. Before us, the appellant filed a letter dated 11.01.2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal stands settled under the Vivad Se

2 Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by Commissioner of Income Tax (IT), Bengaluru.

On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of appeal.

In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19th February, 2021. (S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; "दनांक Dated : 19th February, 2021 Sujeet आदेश क" "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपीलाथ" / The Appellant;

""यथ" / The Respondent;

2.3.

The CIT(A)-12, Bengaluru;

The CCIT (Intl. Tax) (SZ), Bangalore;

DR, ITAT, Panaji; गाड" फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, //// Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune

AGNELO LAWRENCE SANTAN FERNANDES,RIA, ARLEM SALCETE - GOA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD -1, PANAJI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Recent GST High Court judgments