SHRI SUBHASH SHANKAR MAGDUM,NIPANI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NIPANI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal of the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the Revenue had no objection.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee later opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee if they have opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
आदेश / ORDER
This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals), Belagavi dated 06.07.2018 for the assessment year 2012-13 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
The Ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the assessee wants to withdraw the appeal as the assessee has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, 2020 and has filed an application dated 22.02.2021 along with Form-3 by stating as follows :
“Subject : Withdrawal of appeal for AY 2012-13 in the case of Shri Subhash S. Magdum, Nipani With reference to the above appeal, I wish to bring to your kind notice that the above assessee filed an appeal to ITAT, Panaji Bench, against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Belgavi for AY 2012-13, which was filed in your office on 17.10.2018. Now the assessee has filed an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020 on 24.12.2020. The Designated Authority had already issued a certificate in Form 3 which is attached with this letter for your kind reference. The above assessee has already sent a letter dated 19.02.2021 to your office requesting your honor to allow him to withdraw his appeal. However, through oversight the certificate in Form 3 issued by the Designated Authority remained to be enclosed with the letter dated 19.02.2021. Under these circumstances, we request you sir to kindly allow the assessee to withdraw his appeal for AY 2012-13.”
The Ld. DR has no objection in case the assessee wishes to withdraw the appeal. Hence, we permit the withdrawal. Appeal of assessee is dismissed being withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 16th day of March, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026