← Back to search

KNOWLEDGE HUB FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 5/DEL/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 July 20253 pages

Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI MANISH AGARWALITA No. 7/DEL/2025 Knowledge Hub Foundation 1012, 10th Floor, Surya Kiran Building, KG Marg, New Delhi PAN: AAETK3746K Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Delhi

Hearing: 07/07/2025Pronounced: 09/07/2025

PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: These two appeals are filed by the Assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-, Chandigarh (‘Ld. CIT(E)’ for short) dated 17/03/2023 wherein the applications filed by the Assessee for grant of registration u/s 12A(l)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) and in Form 10AB for approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Actwere rejected.

2.

The Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the orders impugned have been passed ex-parte, wherein Ld. CIT(E)has not verified the documents produced by the Appellant and without providing opportunity to the appellant to produce further documents and submissions the orders impugned has been passed. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeals. 3. The Ld. Department's Representative vehemently submitted that the appellant has failed to substantiate the claim in support of the applications filed by the Appellant. Thus, relying on the orders of the Lower Authority, sought for dismissal of the Appeals.

4.

We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. It can be seen from the orders impugned, the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the applications for want of documents to substantiate the claim of the Appellant and the Appellant has not been heard before passing the orders impugned. Considering the above facts and circumstances, we set aside the impugned orders of the Ld. CIT(E) and remand the matter to the file of Ld. CIT(E) with a direction to decide the applications afresh after providing opportunity of being heard to the Appellant. The Appellant is also at liberty to produce any/all documents in support of its claim.

5.

In the result, the appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in the open court on 09th July , 2025 (MANISH AGARWAL)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
Date:- 09.07.2025
R.N, Sr.P.S*
Knowledge Hub Foundation Vs. CIT(E)

KNOWLEDGE HUB FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs CIT(E), NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI | BharatTax