← Back to search

VISHNU DUTT SHARMA,. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 68(1), DELHI, CIVIC CENTRE,NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 2500/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 July 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Sh. Dishant Sethi, Adv.
For Respondent: Sh. Sudeep Dabas, Sr. DR
Hearing: 09.07.2025Pronounced: 09.07.2025

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2022-23, arises against the Addl./JCIT(A), Agra’s DIN & order No.
ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1075048358(1) dated 26.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short
“the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges at the outset that the assessee has filed his application for withdrawal of the instant appeal as under: “Hon'ble Member,

The captioned appeal filed by the assessee is listed for hearing today, i.e., 09.07.2025, before this Hon'ble Bench.

2.

It is submitted that the said appeal was preferred against the order passed by the Ld. Addl/Joint CIT (A), Agra, dated 26.03.2025, whereby the disallowance of Rs. 4,89,882/-, being the relief claimed by the assessee under section 89 of the Income Tax Act on account of arrears of salary/pension received from the Railway Board was sustained. The only reason for sustaining the disallowance was the non-filing of Vishnu Dutt Sharma

2
prescribed Form 10E along with the return of income, which occurred due to a bona fide oversight. It is pertinent to mention that the said Form 10E was subsequently filed on the e-filing portal during the pendency of proceedings before the Ld. CIT(A).

3.

Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the present appeal was filed before this Hon’ble Tribunal. However, in the interregnum, the assessee submitted a request on the e-ling portal for reprocessing of the return, so that the subsequently filed Form 10E could be considered. The CPC has now duly processed the return, granted the relief claimed under section 89, and deleted the consequential demand vide its order dated 26.06.2025. Accordingly, the assessee respectfully submits that the present appeal has become infructuous, and no grievance now survives for adjudication. A copy of the CPC order dated 26.06.2025 is enclosed herewith for kind perusal.

4.

It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Hen’ble Bench may kindly permit the withdrawal of the captioned appeal. A copy of the CPC order dated 26.06.2025 is enclosed herewith for kind perusal.”

4.

The Revenue is equally fair in not disputing these clinching averments made by the assessee at this stage. Ordered accordingly.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms, subject to all just exceptions. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 09/07/2025. (Satbeer Singh Godara)

Judicial Member

Dated: 09/07/2025
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*

VISHNU DUTT SHARMA,. vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 68(1), DELHI, CIVIC CENTRE,NEW DELHI | BharatTax